WebbAbout Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ... Webb2 feb. 2024 · It was later found in the landmark judgment of Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora that this definition of the perpetrator was violative of the fundamental rights. Justice Nariman, in his landmark judgment held that the words “ adult male” in section 2(q) should stand deleted since these words were violative of the principles of …
How To File A Complaint Against Domestic Violence In India?
Webb20 feb. 2024 · A Jammu and Kashmir court recently took cognizance of a complaint filed by a husband against wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jammu Renu Dogra Gupta noted in her order that as per the judgments in Hiral P Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Mohammad … Webb6 sep. 2024 · Hiralal P. Harsora and othrs Vs. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora AIR 2016 SC 4774 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Civil Appeal No. … primary outcome 中文
Law Answer Online- Ask Legal Query Expert Legal Advice
Webb26 mars 2024 · Hiral P. Harsora vs Kusum Narottamdas Harsora - Supreme Court Important Judgment 2016 - On 6th October, 2016, in the case of Hiral P. Harsora and … Webb9 juni 2024 · Because in the Hiral P Harsora's case, the Apex court only stressed on Section 2 (q) of the act and omitted the word "adult male" from the definition of "respondent". And Mohammad Zakir's case could not have been used as a precedent because the Karnataka High court withdrew it. WebbBy contrast, the burden on the State is accurately described by Nariman J in Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora29 where the Court struck down a classiication in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: In holding the date discriminatory and arbitrary and striking it down, this ... players and spectators spokane