In The Case for Animal Rights, Regan argued that non-human animals bear moral rights. His philosophy aligns broadly within the tradition of Immanuel Kant, though he rejects Kant's idea that respect is due only to rational beings. Regan points out that we routinely ascribe inherent value, and thus the right to be treated with respect, to humans who are not rational, including infants and the severely mentally impaired. WebDec 10, 2024 · Tom Regan in 2008. Image credit Bryan Regan, public domain. Philosopher Tom Regan, one of the intellectual founders of the modern animal rights movement, …
Animal Rights and Welfare NC State University Libraries
WebOct 6, 2024 · Tom Regan’s obituary notes that. Regan and Singer are often tagged together as founders of the animal rights movement, but only Regan actually believed in moral … WebIn the essay titled “Religion and Animal Rights” by American Philosopher Tom Regan, Mr. Regan maintains the position that animals are the “subjects-of-a-life”, just as humans are. If we want to ascribe value to all human beings regardless of the degree of rationality they are capable of, then in order to be consistent we must similarly ascribe it to non-human … huntsman\u0027s-cup zq
Tom Regan’s Philosophy of Animal Rights: Subjects-of-a-Life in …
WebTom Regan is Professor of Philosophy at North Carolina State University and is the author of, among other books, Animals and Christianity: A Book of Readings (with Andrew Linzey, … WebJul 18, 2024 · The book The Case for Animal Rights, written by American philosopher Tom Regan (1938-2024), contends that nonhuman animals (as he refers to domesticated … WebAnimal Rights, Human Wrongs by Tom Regan. Tom Regan, an animal rights activist, wrote Animal Rights, Human Wrongs to show that animals have rights in just the same way as … mary beth yount