WebJul 15, 2010 · The most cited case of third-party risks is the studies with the Havasupai tribe [41, 42]. In this community-based research, the community provided samples to study genetic markers related to ... WebOct 20, 2024 · Members of the Havasupai Nation, who had donated blood for genetic studies on type 2 diabetes, found out later that their samples had also been used in several other …
American Indian Genes in the Media: Representations of the …
WebNov 3, 2024 · In 2003, Carletta Tilousi, a member of northern Arizona’s tiny Havasupai Tribe, listened to a student’s doctoral presentation. She was there to hear the results of a diabetes study conducted ... WebDec 12, 2024 · The Havasupai Tribe, Grand Canyon Trust, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity and National Parks Conservation Association intervened in the case in 2013. The groups and the Department of Justice won a 2014 decision by U.S. District Court in Arizona, which upheld Interior’s 2012 uranium mining withdrawal. doi 10.1136/bmj.h176
Appeals Court Upholds Grand Canyon Uranium Mining Ban
WebGarrison, Nanibaa’ A. “Genomic Justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai Case on Genetic Research. ... The author interviewed human genetic researchers and IRB chairs regarding the Havasupai Tribal lawsuit against the Arizona Board of Regents and Arizona State University (ASU) regarding use of DNA sample from tribal members in ... WebIn 2004, the Havasupai Tribe filed a lawsuit against Arizona Board of Regents and ASU researchers for misuse of their DNA samples. The lawsuit articulated concerns about lack of informed consent, violation of civil rights through mishandling of blood samples, unapproved use of data, and violation of medical confidentiality. WebThis is the second time this case has come before us. Background concerning the history of Canyon Mine and this case is discussed in Havasupai Tribe v. Provencio, 906 F.3d 1155, 1159–61 (9th Cir. 2024). Additional background may be found in National Mining Ass’n v. Zinke, 877 F.3d 845, 854–60 (9th Cir. 2024), and Havasupai Tribe v. United doi 10.1136/bmj.g7257